Screener
QMOM vs FDMO
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF vs Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
Key differences
- FDMO costs 0.13% less per year.
- QMOM follows a active selection strategy; FDMO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FDMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMOM | FDMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $519M | $842M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.09% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -39.13% | -33.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QMOM and FDMO
Explore further