Screener
QMOM vs JMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF vs JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
Key differences
- JMOM costs 0.16% less per year.
- JMOM is significantly larger than QMOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QMOM follows a active selection strategy; JMOM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, JMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMOM | JMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $519M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +34.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +16.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 1.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.09% | 14.29% |
| Max drawdown | -39.13% | -34.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QMOM and JMOM
Explore further