Screener
QNXT vs GPIQ
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- QNXT costs 0.09% less per year.
- GPIQ is significantly larger than QNXT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QNXT is classified as equity, while GPIQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QNXT follows a index tracking strategy; GPIQ uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| QNXT | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.66% | 3.56% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.97% | 13.51% |
| Max drawdown | -22.25% | -21.06% |
Similar to QNXT and GPIQ
Explore further