Screener
QPX vs DWAW
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
Key differences
- DWAW costs 0.51% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | DWAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $89M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 15.61% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -31.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and DWAW
Explore further