Screener
QPX vs GK
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Key differences
- GK costs 0.97% less per year.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while GK is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | GK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $29M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +36.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 17.39% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -47.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and GK
Explore further