Screener
QPX vs SAMT
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 1.08% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $619M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +46.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and SAMT
Explore further