Screener
QQEW vs AFMC
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- QQEW costs 0.13% less per year.
- QQEW is significantly larger than AFMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QQEW follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QQEW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQEW | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $153M |
| Since | 2006 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -32.13% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQEW and AFMC
Explore further