Screener
QRMI vs PFFD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF vs Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFD costs 0.37% less per year.
- PFFD is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QRMI is classified as alternative, while PFFD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QRMI follows a option income strategy; PFFD uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QRMI | PFFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 12.36% | 6.30% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.77% | 7.21% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -30.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QRMI and PFFD
Explore further