Screener
QTAC vs AOA
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 1.63% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and AOA
Explore further