Screener
QTAC vs BFLX
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 1.38% less per year.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while BFLX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | — |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -0.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and BFLX
Explore further