Screener
QTAC vs RULE
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- QTAC costs 0.06% less per year.
- QTAC is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; RULE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $14M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and RULE
Explore further