Screener
QTJL vs CGGO
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.32% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTJL is classified as alternative, while CGGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJL | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.26% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -33.40% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJL and CGGO
Explore further