Screener
QTJL vs FAD
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FAD costs 0.16% less per year.
- FAD is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTJL is classified as alternative, while FAD is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; FAD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJL | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $480M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +37.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.26% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -33.40% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJL and FAD
Explore further