Screener
QTJL vs IWO
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWO costs 0.55% less per year.
- IWO is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTJL is classified as alternative, while IWO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJL | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $13.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.26% | 21.41% |
| Max drawdown | -33.40% | -42.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJL and IWO
Explore further