Screener
QTJL vs MTRA
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
Key differences
- MTRA costs 0.25% less per year.
- MTRA is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTJL is classified as alternative, while MTRA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; MTRA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJL | MTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $142M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.26% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.40% | -15.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJL and MTRA
Explore further