Screener
QTUM vs SPAM
Defiance Quantum ETF vs Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.05% less per year.
- QTUM is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTUM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTUM | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $2M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +84.6% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +29.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.08% | 25.42% |
| Max drawdown | -38.45% | -24.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTUM and SPAM
Explore further