Screener
QVMM vs RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- QVMM costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMM | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $408M | $329M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.6% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.37% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -24.00% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMM and RFG
Explore further