Screener
QVMS vs SPHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ is significantly larger than QVMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMS | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.78% | 12.73% |
| Max drawdown | -28.05% | -31.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMS and SPHQ
Explore further