Screener
QVOL vs PFIG
Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.60% less per year.
- QVOL is classified as alternative, while PFIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QVOL follows a option income strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVOL | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $113M |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -3.24% | -15.73% |
Similar to QVOL and PFIG
Explore further