Screener
QWLD vs EMGF
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- EMGF is significantly larger than QWLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QWLD follows a index tracking strategy; EMGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, EMGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QWLD | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2014 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.81% | 19.44% |
| Max drawdown | -31.89% | -40.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QWLD and EMGF
Explore further