Screener
QWLD vs ISCF
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- ISCF costs 0.06% less per year.
- ISCF is significantly larger than QWLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QWLD | ISCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $633M |
| Since | 2014 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.81% | 14.40% |
| Max drawdown | -31.89% | -40.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QWLD and ISCF
Explore further