Screener
QYLG vs BITS
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
Key differences
- QYLG costs 0.30% less per year.
- QYLG is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QYLG is classified as alternative, while BITS is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- QYLG follows a option income strategy; BITS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BITS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QYLG | BITS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $29M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.59% | 22.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.9% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +55.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.31% | 52.62% |
| Max drawdown | -29.90% | -83.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QYLG and BITS
Explore further