Screener
QYLG vs RYLD
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- QYLG costs 0.25% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than QYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QYLG | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 6.59% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.5% | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.29% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -29.90% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QYLG and RYLD
Explore further