Screener
RAAX vs AMAX
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- RAAX costs 0.67% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $60M |
| Since | 2018 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.4% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 10.01% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and AMAX
Explore further