Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RAAX vs AOA

VanEck Real Assets ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

RAAX

VanEck Real Assets ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$905M

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.0B

Key differences

  • AOA costs 0.54% less per year.
  • AOA is significantly larger than RAAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RAAX is classified as alternative, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
  • RAAX follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RAAXAOA
Annual cost (TER)0.69%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$905M$3.0B
Since20182008
Dividend yield1.93%2.12%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Region
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+37.4%+26.0%
CAGR 3Y+21.7%+17.7%
CAGR 5Y+14.2%+9.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.231.16
Volatility 1Y13.64%10.72%
Max drawdown-33.91%-28.38%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RAAX and AOA