Screener
RAAX vs EMBX
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- RAAX costs 0.07% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than EMBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX is classified as alternative, while EMBX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $244M |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.4% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 5.86% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and EMBX
Explore further