Screener
RBUF vs RZV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RZV costs 0.44% less per year.
- RZV is significantly larger than RBUF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RBUF is classified as alternative, while RZV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RBUF follows a structured outcome strategy; RZV uses index tracking.
- RZV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RBUF | RZV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $265M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | 20.84% |
| Max drawdown | -11.36% | -60.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RBUF and RZV
Explore further