Screener
RDOG vs EFAS
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- RDOG costs 0.20% less per year.
- EFAS is significantly larger than RDOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RDOG covers north america markets; EFAS covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RDOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RDOG | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $48M |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -49.35% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RDOG and EFAS
Explore further