Screener
RDOG vs IFGL
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- RDOG costs 0.13% less per year.
- IFGL is significantly larger than RDOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RDOG covers north america markets; IFGL covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, RDOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RDOG | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $88M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 3.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +11.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 13.69% |
| Max drawdown | -49.35% | -40.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RDOG and IFGL
Explore further