Screener
RDOG vs OUSA
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF vs ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares
Key differences
- RDOG costs 0.13% less per year.
- OUSA is significantly larger than RDOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RDOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RDOG | OUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $751M |
| Since | 2008 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 9.87% |
| Max drawdown | -49.35% | -33.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RDOG and OUSA
Explore further