Screener
RDTY vs RYLD
YieldMax Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- RYLD costs 1.13% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than RDTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RDTY | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.73% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 45.20% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.02% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -17.30% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RDTY and RYLD
Explore further