Screener
REFA vs CGGR
Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- REFA follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| REFA | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $22.2B |
| Since | — | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -11.24% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REFA and CGGR
Explore further