Screener
REGS vs VUG
Columbia ETF Trust I - Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- REGS follows a active selection strategy; VUG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| REGS | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $365.0B |
| Since | — | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.91% |
| Max drawdown | -7.43% | -35.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REGS and VUG
Explore further