Screener
REM vs FPRO
iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF vs Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
Key differences
- REM costs 0.09% less per year.
- REM is significantly larger than FPRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REM follows a index tracking strategy; FPRO uses active selection.
- REM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REM | FPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $580M | $15M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 8.60% | 2.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.5% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.7% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.40 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.86% | 13.08% |
| Max drawdown | -68.52% | -32.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REM and FPRO
Explore further