Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REMC vs ECON

Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF

REMC

Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

ECON

Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.47%

Fund size

$326M

Key differences

  • REMC covers north america markets; ECON covers emerging markets.
  • REMC follows a active selection strategy; ECON uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

REMCECON
Annual cost (TER)0.47%
Fund size (AUM)$326M
Since2010
Dividend yield1.51%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+60.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+23.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.08
Volatility 1Y20.32%
Max drawdown-6.64%-45.37%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REMC and ECON