Screener
REMC vs XSHQ
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- REMC follows a active selection strategy; XSHQ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMC | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $246M |
| Since | — | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.57% |
| Max drawdown | -6.64% | -38.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMC and XSHQ
Explore further