Skip to content
Screener

REMG vs EMBX

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$103M

EMBX

VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.76%

Fund size

$242M

Key differences

REMG is an equity ETF, while EMBX is a fixed income ETF. REMG charges 0.64% a year and EMBX 0.76%.

  • REMG is an equity fund, while EMBX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • REMG costs 0.12% less per year.
  • EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

REMGEMBX
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.76%
Fund size (AUM)$103M$242M
Since20252012
Dividend yield1.08%5.33%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+48.4%+11.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.2%
CAGR 5YN/A-2.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.12
Volatility 1Y22.13%6.07%
Max drawdown-14.13%-37.55%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to REMG and EMBX