Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REMG vs GEM

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$103M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both REMG and GEM are equity ETFs. REMG charges 0.64% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: REMG follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • REMG follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • GEM costs 0.29% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than REMG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

REMGGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$103M$1.7B
Since20252015
Dividend yield1.08%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+45.2%+41.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.00
Volatility 1Y21.69%20.62%
Max drawdown-14.13%-37.02%

Similar to REMG and GEM