Screener
REMG vs IWF
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWF costs 0.46% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than REMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REMG covers emerging markets markets; IWF covers north america.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $124.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMG and IWF
Explore further