Screener
REMG vs RNEM
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
Key differences
- REMG costs 0.12% less per year.
- REMG is significantly larger than RNEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMG | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $17M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -38.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMG and RNEM
Explore further