Screener
REMG vs XCNY
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.45% less per year.
- REMG is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMG | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMG and XCNY
Explore further