Screener
RESM vs SCHC
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- RESM covers north america markets; SCHC covers global ex us.
- RESM follows a active selection strategy; SCHC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RESM | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $5.5B |
| Since | — | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -8.50% | -43.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RESM and SCHC
Explore further