Screener
RESM vs SPHQ
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Key differences
- RESM follows a active selection strategy; SPHQ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RESM | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $17.3B |
| Since | — | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.73% |
| Max drawdown | -8.50% | -31.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RESM and SPHQ
Explore further