Screener
RETL vs FAZ
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- RETL costs 0.07% less per year.
- FAZ is significantly larger than RETL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RETL follows a leveraged strategy; FAZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, RETL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RETL | FAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $120M |
| Since | 2010 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 3.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | -9.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | -38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -29.1% | -27.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | -0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 60.15% | 43.24% |
| Max drawdown | -92.00% | -99.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RETL and FAZ
Explore further