Screener
REVS vs DFAT
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.09% less per year.
- DFAT is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; DFAT uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, REVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | DFAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $13.7B |
| Since | 2019 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 16.99% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -26.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and DFAT
Explore further