Screener
REVS vs FFLV
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.19% less per year.
- REVS is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REVS covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
- REVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $17M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and FFLV
Explore further