Screener
REVS vs FNDC
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.20% less per year.
- FNDC is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 14.29% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and FNDC
Explore further