Screener
REVS vs PY
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; PY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, REVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $212M |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.63% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and PY
Explore further