Screener
REVS vs REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; REMC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | — |
| Since | 2019 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.63% | — |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -6.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and REMC
Explore further