Screener
REVS vs SCHV
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.15% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 10.71% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and SCHV
Explore further